|
REFERENCES
Piotrow, P., Kincaid, D., Rimon. J. & Rinehart, W. (1997).
Health communications: Lessons from family planning and reproductive
health. Westport: Praeger.
Prabhu, J. (2001). Some Challenges Facing Multiculturalism in a
Globalized World. Revision, 24 (1), 30-38.
Purdey, A., Adhikari G., Robinson, S., & Cox, P. (1994). Participatory
health development in rural Nepal: Clarifying the process of community
empowerment, Health education Quarterly, 21 (3), 329-343.
Queiroz, A. (1992). TV de papel: A imprensa como instrumento de
legitimação da televisão. Piracicaba: Unimep.
Quiroz, M. (1993). La telenovela en el Peru. In A. Fadul (Ed) Serial
fiction in TV: The Latin American telenovelas. São Paulo:
University of São Paulo.
Radway, J. (1991). Reading the romance: Women, patriarchy, and
popular literature. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina
Press.
Reardon, K., & Rogers, E. (1988). Interpersonal versus mass
media communication: A false dichotomy. Human Communication Research,
15, 284-303.
Reis, R. (1998). A gente se vê depois da novela. Doctoral
dissertaiton, University of Oregon, Portland.
Reis, R. (1999). What prevents cable TV from taking off in Brazil?
Journal of Broadcasting and Eletronic Media, 43 (3): 339-415.
Richard, R. (2000). Is cultural recognition a useful concept for
leftists? Critical Horizons, 1, (1): 7-20.
Rivera, J. (1968). El folletín y la novella popular. Buenos
Aires: Centro Editorial de América Latina.
Rogers, E. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. (3rd ed.) New York:
Free Press.
Rogers, E. (1976). Communication and development: The passing of
the dominant paradigm. Communication Research, 3, (2): 213-240.
Rogers, E. (1994). A history of communication study: A biographical
approach. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E.(1998). When the mass media have strong effects: Intermedia
processes. In Judith Trent (Ed.), Communication: Views from the
helm for the twenty-first century. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Rogers, E., & Antola L. (1985). “Telenovelas, a Latin
American success story”, Journal of Communication, 35: 24-35.
Rowe, W., & Schelling, V. (1991). Memory and Modernity: Popular
Culture in Latin America. London: Verso.
Rubin, A., & Perse, E. (1987). Audience activity and soap opera
involvement: A uses and effects investigation. Human Communication
Research, 14, 246-268.
Rubin, R., & McHugh, M. (1987). Development of parasocial interaction
relationships, Journal of Broadcast and Electronic Media, 31, 279-292.
Ryerson, W. (1994). Population Communications International: It’s
role in family planning soap operas, Population and Environment,
15(4): 255-264.
Schramm. W. (1964). Mass media and national development: The role
of information in the developing countries. Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Schwoch, J. (1990). The American radio industry and its Latin American
activities 1890-1939. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Seibel, B. (1985). Historia del Circo. Buenos Aires: Ediciones
del Sol.
Servaes, J. (1989). One world, multiple cultures: a new paradigm
on communication for development. Leuven: Acco.
Servaes, J. (1996). Introduction: Participatory communication and
research in development settings. In Servaes, J., Jacobson, T. &
White, S. (Eds.), Participatory communication for social change.
Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Servaes, J. (1996). Communication for Development in a Global Perspective:
The Role of Governmental and Non-Governmental Agencies, Communications,
21 (4), 407-418.
Shery, J. (1997). Pro Social Soap Operas for Development: A Review
for Research and Theory. The Journal of International Communication,
4(2): 75-101.
Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). Pedagogy for liberation: dialogues
on transforming education. Massachussets: Bergin and Garven.
Simpson, C. (1993). US Mass Communication Research counterinsurgency
and scientific reality. In McCombs M., Shaw D., Weaver D. eds.,
Communication and Democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers
in the agenda-setting theory, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sinclair, J. (1999). Latin American television: A global view.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singh, J. (2002) Communication technology and development: Instrumental,
institutional, participatory, and strategic approaches. In Gundykanst
W. B. & Mody B. (Eds.) International and multicultural communication.
(2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. (2002). A Theoretical agenda for
Entertainment-Education. Communication Theory, 12 (2): 117-135.
Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. (1999). Entertainment-education:
A communication strategy for social change. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. (1988). Television Soap Operas for
Development in India. Gazette, 41:109-126.
Singhal, A., Rogers, E., & Brown, W. J. (1993). Harnessing
the potential of entertainment-education telenovelas. Gazette, 51:1-18.
Singhal, A., Obregon, R., & Rogers, E. (1994). Reconstructing
the story of “Simplemente Maria”. The most popular telenovela
in Latin America of all times. Gazette, 54:147-158.
Smith, L. (1994). A content-analysis of gender differences in children
advertising. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 38 (1):
323-337.
Sood. S. (1999). Audience Involvement with “Tinka Tinka Sukh”
an entertainment-education radio soap opera in India: An analysis
of media effects. Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico,
Albuquerque.
Sood, S. (2002). Audience involvement and Entertainment-Education
(2002). Communication Theory, 12, (2): 153-172.
Sood, S., & Rogers, E. (2000). Dimensions of parasocial interaction
by letter-writers to a popular entertainment-education soap opera
in India. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, (44):
386-414.
|
